Last week, the Internet became the 51st Internet to fit Facebook, the world's largest and most untrusted social media platform. The uproar is about the ban on what the platform considers to be the extreme right extremists of Info Wars' Alex Jones, Milo Iannopros, Laura Rumer, and Islamic leader Louis Farakan. According to company spokespersons, these individual accounts have been deleted for content that violates Facebook's policies based on their terms of use against dangerous individuals and organizations.
Ironically, Facebook had previously taken partial action against Alex Jones and Infowars, but found a home on Facebook's sister platform Instagram, gaining hundreds of thousands of followers in a few days, and the platform Fertilized the basis for his followers to continue to engage in his work. When news about Facebook's latest mess spread in word of mouth, users were angry and opposed what is now called censorship and a complete violation of the First Amendment. Online anger is drastically drowning in fear rather than personal value, and Facebook's policies and actions have branched to the point where people are no longer comfortable.
When the band plays, the social media user chorus sings the same old song, "I will delete the account, but this time it means! "
But did anyone really mean this time?
Facebook has received a lot of scrutiny of how we processed the personal information of at least 50 million users over the past year. Regulators and legislators immediately updated the call to seize violations and strengthen monitoring. The scandal has sent many users running to the threat of deleting accounts. Many studies have shown that only 1 in 10 people actually experienced it. Complaints about the platform, especially about algorithms and misinformation. And this app no longer sits on my smartphone face, but I'm still listed as an active user.
Here is what you need to understand. Social media network platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are for-profit private companies. Being a user is a privilege, not a right. We are crying about protecting free expression on the Internet, where thousands of other platforms exist in the exact same market. We ask the government to help manage the content of entities used for selfish reasons when they don't need any help for this service. Don't get me wrong. I am not a fan of people who can limit my freedom of expression and freedom of speech. However, we are well aware of the fact that you don't have to create an account on Facebook or any other social media platform, and you can always delete your account. The same applies to other countries.
The value of social media networks depends on the composition of people, not necessarily the information posted there. People are networks. We are value. We have power. There are literally thousands of destinations on the Internet where you can connect and talk with people. There are many social networks with great features without a community. But whatever the reason, many people still choose Facebook. One of the biggest advantages of the cyber world is that it has revolutionized communication capabilities.
A society claiming to focus on the protection of freedom of expression has come to the right to seize the decision by finally leaving the most abusive husbands of the web around the world and moving to new ones. Relationship with another platform. However, if you don't do this, you should stop complaining.
This post have 0 komentar
EmoticonEmoticon